Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2011, 76, 51-64
https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc2010127
Published online 2010-12-19 17:15:14

An accurate analytical representation of the bridge function of hard spheres and a question of existence of a general closure to the Ornstein–Zernike equation

Magda Francováa, Anatol Malijevskýb,*, Stanislav Labíkb and Jiří Kolafab

a Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, J. E. Purkynje University, České mládeže 8, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
b Department of Physical Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic

References

1. Hansen J.-P., McDonald I. R.: Theory of Simple Fluids. Academic Press, Amsterdam 2003.
2. Martynov G. A., Sarkisov G. N.: Mol. Phys. 1983, 49, 1495. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978300102111>
3. Rogers F. J., Young D. A.: Phys. Rev. A 1984, 30, 999. <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.30.999>
4. Labík S., Malijevský A., Smith W. R.: Mol. Phys. 1991, 73, 495. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979100101341>
5a. Ballone P., Pastore G., Galli G., Gazzilo D.: Mol. Phys. 1986, 59, 275. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978600102071>
5b. Zerah G., Hansen J.-P.: J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 2336. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.450397>
5c. Zhou Y., Stell G.: J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 5533. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.458486>
5d. Martynov G. A., Sarkisov G. N., Vompe A. G.: J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 3961. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.478276>
5e. Sarkisov G. N.: J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 9496. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1365107>
6. Bomont J.-P.: Adv. Chem. Phys. 2008, 139, 1. <https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470259498.ch1>
7. Nijboer B. R. A., van Hove L.: Phys. Rev. 1952, 85, 777. <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.777>
8. Labík S., Gabrielová H., Kolafa J., Malijevský A.: Mol. Phys. 2003, 101, 1139. <https://doi.org/10.1080/0026897031000068596>
9. Kolafa J., Labík S.: Mol. Phys. 2006, 104, 1915. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970600664925>
10. Taylor M. P., Lipson J. E. G.: J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 7851. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.463459>
11. Rast S., Fries P. H., Krienke H.: Mol. Phys. 1999, 96, 1543. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979909483097>
12. Kwak S. K., Kofke D. A.: J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 104508. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1860559>
13. Chen W. W., Kwak S. K.: Mol. Phys. 2009, 107, 2213. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970903228733>
14. Malijevský A., Labík S.: Mol. Phys. 1987, 60, 663. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978700100441>
15. Henderson D., Sokołowski S.: J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 92, 5535.
16. Yuste S. B., Santos A.: Phys. Rev. A 1996, 43, 5418. <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.43.5418>
17. Kolafa J., Labík S., Malijevský A.: Mol. Phys. 2002, 100, 2629. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970210136357>
18. http://www.vscht.cz/fch/software/hsmd.
19. Kolafa J., Labík S., Malijevský A.: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 2335. <https://doi.org/10.1039/b402792b>
20. Francová M.: Ph.D. Thesis. Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague, Prague 2008.
21a. Duh D.-M., Haymet A. D. J.: J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 7716. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.463491>
21b. Duh D.-M., Haymet A. D. J.: J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 2625. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470724>
22. Fantoni R., Pastore G.: J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 10681. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1739392>
23. Rosenfeld Y.: J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 8126. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464569>
24a. Lado F.: Phys. Rev. A 1973, 8, 2548. <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.8.2548>
24b. Rosenfeld Y., Ashcroft N. W.: Phys. Rev. A 1979, 20, 1208. <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.20.1208>
24c. Foiles S. M., Ashcroft N. W., Reatto L.: J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 4441. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447225>