Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2008, 73, 481-506
https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc20080481

Handling Electrostatic Interactions in Molecular Simulations: A Systematic Study

Jiří Kolafaa, Filip Moučkab and Ivo Nezbedab,c,*

a Department of Physical Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
b Faculty of Science, J. E. Purkinje University, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
c E. Hála Laboratory of Thermodynamics, Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 165 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic

References

1. Frenkel D., Smit B.: Understanding Molecular Simulation. Academic Press, San Diego 2002.
2. Sagui C., Darden T. A.: J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 6578. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1352646>
3. Smith W., Todorov I. T.: Mol. Simul. 2006, 32, 935. <https://doi.org/10.1080/08927020600939830>
4. http://www.vscht.cz/fch/software/macsimus.
5. Allen M. P., Tildesley D. J.: Computer Simulation of Liquids. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1987.
6. Barker J. A., Watts R. O.: Mol. Phys. 1973, 26, 789. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977300102101>
7. Neumann M.: Mol. Phys. 1983, 50, 841. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978300102721>
8. Steinbach P. J., Brooks B. R.: J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15, 667. <https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540150702>
9. Mahoney M. W., Jorgensen W. L.: J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 8910. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481505>
10. Lísal M., Kolafa J., Nezbeda I.: J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 8892. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1514572>
11. Rick S. W.: J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 6085. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1652434>
12. Yonetani Y.: Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 406, 49. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2005.02.073>
13. Yonetani Y.: J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 204501. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2198208>
14. van der Spoel D., van Maaren P. J.: J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2, 1. <https://doi.org/10.1021/ct0502256>
15. Mathias G., Egwolf B., Nonella M., Tavan P.: J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 10847. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1574774>
16. Solvason D., Kolafa J., Petersen H. G., Perram J. W.: Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995, 87, 307. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00027-D>
17. Fennell C. J., Gezelter J. D.: J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 234104. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2206581>
18. Yeh I.-C., Berkowitz M. L.: J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 3155. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.479595>
19. Abascal J. L. F., Vega C.: J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 234505. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2121687>
20. Mecke M., Fischer J., Winkelmann J.: J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 5842. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1349177>
21. Perram J. W., Smith E. R.: J. Stat. Phys. 1987, 46, 179. <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01010339>
22. Jedlovszky P., Pálinkás G.: Mol. Phys. 1995, 84, 217. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979500100171>
23. Steinhauser O.: Mol. Phys. 1982, 45, 335. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978200100281>
24. Eppenga R., Frenkel D.: Mol. Phys. 1984, 52, 1303. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978400101951>
25. Picálek J., Kolafa J.: J. Mol. Liq. 2007, 134, 29. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2006.12.015>
26. Zahn D., Schilling B., Kast S. M.: J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 10725. <https://doi.org/10.1021/jp025949h>
27. Panagiotopoulos A. Z.: Mol. Phys. 1987, 61, 813. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978700101491>
28. Kolafa J., Perram J. W.: Mol. Simul. 1992, 9, 351. <https://doi.org/10.1080/08927029208049126>
29. Nezbeda I., Kolafa J.: Mol. Simul. 1995, 14, 153. <https://doi.org/10.1080/08927029508022013>
30. Flyvbjerg H., Petersen H. G.: J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91, 461. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.457480>
31. Sagui C., Darden T. A.: Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1999, 28, 155. <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.28.1.155>
32. Vega C., de Miguel E.: J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 154707. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2715577>
33. Vega C., Abascal J. L. F., Nezbeda I.: J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 034503. <https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2215612>