Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.
2005, 70, 621-637
https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc20050621
Quantum Mechanics Needs No Interpretation
Lubomír Skálaa,b,* and Vojtěch Kapsaa
a Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Ke Karlovu 3, 121 16 Prague 2, Czech Republic
b Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
References
1. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1999, 71, S288.
< A.: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S288>
2. Arndt M., Nairz O., Zeilinger A. in: Quantum [Un]speakables. From Bell to Quantum Information (R. A. Bertlmann and A. Zeilinger, Eds). Springer, Berlin 2002.
3. Nature 1991, 351, 111.
< M. O., Englert B. G., Walther H.: https://doi.org/10.1038/351111a0>
4. Am. J. Phys. 2001, 69, 655.
< F.: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1356698>
5. Physics Today 2000, 70.
< A., Peres A.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.883004>
6. Proc. Cambr. Phil. Soc. 1925, 22, 700.
< R. A.: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100009580>
7. Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top. 1995, 52, 2274.
B., Soffer B. H.:
8. Roy Frieden B.: Physics from Fisher Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
9. Cover T., Thomas J.: Elements of Information Theory. Wiley, New York 1991.
10. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2000, 62, 012107.
< M. J. W.: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.012107>
11. Phys. Lett. A 1992, 169, 123.
< B.: https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(92)90581-6>
12. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2001, 64, 052103.
< M. J. W.: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052103>
13. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 1998, 58, 1775.
< M.: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1775>
14. Davydov A. S.: Quantum Mechanics. Pergamon Press, New York 1976.