Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1984, 49, 2050-2069
https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc19842050

Electrostatic effects on conformational equilibria: Solvation enthalpies and the reaction field theory

Zdeněk Friedla, Pavel Fiedlerb, Ján Birošc, Věra Uchytilovád, Igor Tvaroškae, Stanislav Böhmf and Otto Exnerb

a Department of Organic Chemistry, Slovak Institute of Technology, 812 37 Bratislava
b Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 166 10 Prague 6
c Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 162 06 Prague 6
d Department of Physical Chemistry, Prague Institute of Chemical Technology, 166 28 Prague 6
e Chemical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 809 33 Bratislava
f Department of Organic Chemistry, Prague Institute of Chemical Technology, 166 28 Prague 6

Abstract

Solvation enthalpies of isomeric methyl 2-, 3-, and 4-fluorobenzoates in solvents n-hexane and nitromethane were determined calorimetrically. The enthalpy of the conformational equilibrium apsp of methyl 2-fluorobenzoate was estimated from the temperature dependence of IR spectra and served to calculate the solvation enthalpies of the two conformers, although with a considerable uncertainty. All the results together were discussed in terms of two theories: a) the simple electrostatic approach predicting the reaction enthalphy from the coulombic interaction of atomic charges in an apparently homogenous medium, and b) the extended reaction-field theory expressing the solvation energy as a sum of dipole, quadrupole, cavity, and dispersion terms. In addition, quantum chemical calculations on various levels were carried out. Comparison with experiments revealed that the reaction-field theory, even if extended, reproduces only the general trend in the solvation enthalpies. Of the individual terms particularly the dispersion term is likely to be responsible for the bad fit: it is significant but cannot be satisfactorily predicted by the present theory. Also cavity term is mispresented by theory while it is in fact unimportant for isomeric molecules. The simple electrostatic approach predicts the reaction enthalpy in the gas phase relatively well, i.e. with a similar precision as semiempirical quantum chemical methods. In solvents this approach works worse, but still better than a two-step calculation consisting of the electrostatic gas-phase value and of the reaction-field solvation enthalpy; the latter procedure cannot be generally recommended. Summarizing, our results are in favour of simple theories which yield approximate results of the same quality as the more sophisticated ones, sometimes even better.